My quick rating - 4.5/10. I had no idea what I was getting with Dinner to Die For, but it serves up a fun premise with a sharp knife. Then spends most of its runtime trying to figure out which course it actually wants to be.
The film follows Hannah, played by Shamilla Miller, a culinary photographer with a taste for true crime, and her equally obsessed friend Evan, portrayed by Steven John Ward (serial killer-sounding name). The two decide to spice up their hobby by role-playing their own true crime scenario, complete with a killer meal and the “girl next door” trope. Naturally, because this is a thriller and not a Food Network special, fantasy and reality collide, and one deadly mistake ensures that no one at the table leaves with clean hands.
Here’s the main issue. This story definitely did not have to be 75 minutes long. It is either a tight and vicious 25-minute short film or a fully fleshed-out mini-series with time to breathe. Instead, it awkwardly falls right in the middle, like an uncooked entrĂ©e. The film completely skimps on the development of the recipe book angle, which could have easily been its own compelling thread. Then it rushes into a flashback structure that feels crammed. Each character’s psychological descent could’ve used a solid 30–40 minutes of dedicated focus. As it stands, the material just doesn’t fit the feature-length format.
That mismatch is the movie’s biggest drawback. The bones of a good story are here, but the pacing is all over the place. It skates around its concept without ever fully embracing it until the finale. And while memorable, it isn’t quite as explosive as it needs to be. The suspense never fully simmers. It kinda stays at a light boil (I will run out of cooking references LOL).
Performance-wise, though, the film is held together by Miller. She carries the emotional weight and makes Hannah feel grounded even when the story isn’t. Steven John Ward plays Evan as a complete doormat, which he absolutely has to be for the story mechanics to function, and he commits to it. You may find yourself wanting to shake him through the screen, but that’s part of the design.
The effects, when they show up, are decent enough. They don’t dominate the film, but they do their job without pulling you out of the experience.
For a first-time feature-length effort, director Diana Mills Smith shows promise. There is a good understanding of tone and character relationships, even if the execution isn’t quite there. With a different pacing or format that is more suited to the story, this could have been something unique.
As it stands, Dinner to Die For is an interesting concept, plated nicely, acted well, but served in the wrong portion size. Some of you may get more out of its psychological angle, but for me, the suspense just didn’t quite satisfy. Sometimes the recipe is good, but it just needs the right cooking time.






